That level of support holds consistently across age groups, genders and regions. But what stood out even more than the headline figure was what shoppers identified as the primary reason for their support: protecting retail workers. More than half cited staff protection as the number one benefit of body-worn cameras, ahead of deterring theft, gathering evidence or any other consideration.
Shoppers are not viewing this technology through a surveillance lens. They see it as something that helps keep the people serving them safer. That distinction matters enormously when it comes to how retailers communicate deployment decisions internally, and to their customers.
This finding is particularly significant because colleague scepticism or discomfort is one of the commonly cited barriers when retailers consider deployment. But when your own customers, independently surveyed, say the primary benefit of body-worn cameras is to protect the people serving them, that is a powerful message to share with frontline teams. It reframes the conversation: this is not surveillance imposed on staff, it is a protection measure that the public actively supports.
Our research also addressed one of the most common concerns retailers raise: will it put customers off? The answer is clear. 87% of shoppers said body-worn cameras would not have a negative impact on their shopping behaviour, with many saying they would actively feel safer or more reassured. Only 9% said they would avoid staff or leave the store. For any retailer already operating CCTV or employing door staff, that figure falls well within normal tolerance.